|Title||An Analysis on McGinn’s Mysterianism: Reply to Erhan Demircioglu|
|Publication Type||Journal Article|
|Year of Publication||2017|
|Journal||Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi|
|Pagination||11 - 18|
|Keywords||Colin McGinn, Erhan Demircioglu, cognitive closure, naturalist solution, objective space|
This paper discusses Erhan Demicioglu’s approach to McGinn’s mysterianism. Demircioglu argues that the reasons why McGinn considers his cognitive closure idea to be true with respect to the solution of the mind-brain problem are not compatible with his claim about the existence of a naturalist solution to the mind-brain problem. However, I consider such a criticism to be theresult of missing some important details in McGinn’s thesis on cognitive closure. In this study by analysing McGinn’s mysterianism I show that no contradiction exists between the reasons why McGinn presented his cognitive closure thesis and the existence of a naturalist solution to the mind-body problem.
An Analysis on McGinn’s Mysterianism: Reply to Erhan Demircioglu